final cambiado en la película de Watchmen?

[Donnie Darko]

Todo se generó en los foros de imdb solo como rumores. Todavía no se sabe bien.

De acuerdo a los información, el clímax de la novela gráfica en donde Ozymandias suelta un calamar modificado genéticamente en Nueva York para hacer explotar la ciudad, no está en la película. En cambio, el elaborado plan para impedir una guerra nuclear para unir a Estados Unidos y Rusia incluye un desarrollo en donde Ozymandias & el Dr. Manhattan crean una máquina que imita los poderes de Manhattan, la cual Veidt utiliza para detonar explosiones atómicas en varias ciudades alrededor del mundo.

En una nota Kevin Smith, que ya vió la película, dijo esto:

Q: Right now, you have, I believe, seen the two biggest films of 2009.

KS: Watchmen and Star Trek – they’re awesome. Both are fantastic.

Q: Some have been saying the ending is slightly different.


KS: It’s a little different. While it is a slight departure, it actually makes sense in the context of the story because it brings the characters back into it. It kind of makes the movie more about them by the end of it because of the switch they made. I would never say that Alan Moore fucked it up or something. I love the ending of the Watchmen comic book, but I think this ending works just as well.

Que les parece?

[Jack]

Como el orto.
Bah, si efectivamente cambiaron el final del cómic por el de las explosiones nucleares Manhattan+Veidt, me parece bastante fulero... el final del cómic es fantástico, si lo modificaron, espero que haya sido por algo al menos igual de genial.

[Elrom]

que genial que cambien momentos importantes por otros


NOT

[ánima]

Gracias por arruinar mi año.

[Ignatius]

Veidt por malo tiene q terminar castigado, por supesto, asi q se va a morir de cancer y los demas, Roscharch incluido, van a cantar junto al arcoiris "we are the world" por la unidad de las diferentes etnias del mundo y los desnutridos de Africa.
Y Manhattan se cura y vuelve con la ex.

Viva Hollywood!!!!!!!!!!! !

:Alan Moore cortandose los huevitos con una cerealita:

[valium]

No sean nerds puristas infelices.

Es genial genial Watchmen, pero no inmejorable.

[ánima]

Igual que la Giaconda, y?

Igual la actitud de Alan Moore es lo peor, si tanto le importara SU arte, no hubiese vendido TODOS sus derechos.

[Johnny M]

ES RE VISIONARIO ESTE SNYDERRRRRR

[FANTOCHE]

Igual la actitud de Alan Moore es lo peor, si tanto le importara SU arte, no hubiese vendido TODOS sus derechos.

Sabes que me parece que los de Watchmen se los "afanaron" o algo asi..
Juaj, no se si W, pero algunas de sus obras no las tenia.
Creo que era W,como lo hizo en DC, no son de el, son de DC.
Me parece ehh, a un monton de tipos les paso eso con DC o Marvel.
Por eso sacaba todo con ABC, donde quedaba con sus obras..

Frank Miller se paso a Darkhorse justamente porque Marvel no le daba los derechos de Daredevil.

En mi mente Watchmen es de DC, no de Moore.
Alguien que Acredite o Deniege mi post. YA!

[Donnie Darko]

Disagreements about the ownership of the story ultimately led Alan Moore to sever ties with DC Comics.[60] Not wanting to work under a work for hire arrangement, Moore and Gibbons had a reversion clause in their contract for Watchmen. Speaking at the 1985 San Diego Comicon, Moore said "The way it works, if I understand it, is that DC owns it for the time they're publishing it, and then it reverts to Dave and me, so we can make all the money from the Slurpee cups."[9] For Watchmen, Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons received eight percent of the series' earnings.[8] Moore explained in 1986 that his understanding was that when "DC have not used the characters for a year, they're ours."[3] Both Moore and Gibbons said DC paid them "a substantial amount of money" to retain the rights. Moore added, "So basically they're not ours, but if DC is working with the characters in our interests then they might as well be. On the other hand, if the characters have outlived their natural life span and DC doesn't want to do anything with them, then after a year we've got them and we can do what we want with them, which I'm perfectly happy with."[3] Moore says he left DC in 1989 due to the language in his contracts for Watchmen and his V for Vendetta series with artist David Lloyd. Moore felt the reversion clauses were ultimately meaningless, because DC did not intend to let the publications go out of print. He told The New York Times in 2006, "I said, 'Fair enough,' [...] 'You have managed to successfully swindle me, and so I will never work for you again.'"[60] In 2000, Moore publicly distanced himself from DC's plans for a fifteenth anniversary Watchmen hardcover release as well as a proposed line of action figures. While DC wanted to mend its relationship with the writer, Moore felt the company was not treating him fairly in regards to his America's Best Comics imprint (launched under the Wildstorm comic imprint, which was bought by DC in 1998; Moore was promised no direct interference by DC as part of the arrangement). Moore added, "As far as I'm concerned, the 15th anniversary of Watchmen is purely a 15th Anniversary of when DC managed to take the Watchmen property from me and Dave [Gibbons

..

[ánima]

Ignatus, Manhattan no se tiene que curar de nada eh? auja caiste en la trampa de Veidt =(

Si vamos al punto, lo del calamar, le agrega como un SHOCK, pero lo importante es el porqué lo hizo. Obviamente que las imagenes de un calamar gigante coin gente muerta por todos lados vende más que otra explosion armaggedon wannabe